EnviroEconomics.ca

…environmental economics and the implications of environmental policy

Transportation Fuel Standards – Something to worry about or not

with 25 comments

The third largest user of transportation fuels is California, behind the rest of the US and China. And apparently noises of a Low Carbon Fuel Standard in California, similar to the US defense fuel standard banning oil sands oil in federal vehicles, have the Alberta oilmen scared. See here:

the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, a new regulation that could fast-forward Canada’s carbon-intensive deposits into extinction before they reach their potential….

… The Alberta oilmen are there for damage control. Canadian producers are investing billions of dollars on new oil sands projects aimed at supplying oil primarily to the U.S. market, but which generate more greenhouse gases than other sources.

Scary stuff if you are sitting on billions invested…or is it? The article goes on to say that currently no Canadian oil is being exported to California. If this is the case, one has to wonder why this is a big deal? The way current Alberta and CND federal policy is going, new oil sands facilities will be required to significantly reduce their emission intensity through carbon capture, or some other lower carbon energy (nukes). So you have to wonder why get uptight over a potential export constraint that may actually be an export opportunity for new facilities who have lower emission intensities. phew.

And herein lays the myth. If California is such a goldmine for selling low carbon fuel, then why worry? With CCS coming, is there not unlimited opportunity to sell low intensity oil to California? Is this not a benefit of cleaning up our emissions and the current regulations? It seems that a more balanced view is US low carbon US fuel standards present an opportunity. But no, I guess that would not sell newspapers. And yes, you have to also believe in the credibility of the CCS regulations and the California policy.

Perhaps the only clear observation from this is that oil sands project planners must down Tylenol by the handful.

Written by Dave Sawyer

November 2nd, 2008 at 3:09 pm

25 Responses to 'Transportation Fuel Standards – Something to worry about or not'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Transportation Fuel Standards – Something to worry about or not'.

  1. .

    ñïàñèáî!…

    theodore

    27 Jul 14 at 5:50 am

  2. .

    ???!!…

    Alex

    22 Aug 14 at 4:47 pm

  3. .

    good….

    Erik

    23 Aug 14 at 2:57 pm

  4. .

    thanks for information….

    brandon

    23 Aug 14 at 3:19 pm

  5. .

    good!!…

    leon

    23 Aug 14 at 3:56 pm

  6. .

    ???????….

    mario

    23 Aug 14 at 7:43 pm

  7. .

    good info….

    ken

    24 Aug 14 at 7:43 am

  8. .

    hello!…

    Fernando

    16 Nov 14 at 3:25 pm

  9. .

    tnx for info….

    nicholas

    18 Nov 14 at 11:46 am

  10. .

    thanks….

    floyd

    18 Nov 14 at 9:02 pm

  11. .

    ñïñ!…

    arthur

    19 Nov 14 at 6:33 am

  12. .

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

    calvin

    21 Nov 14 at 6:21 am

  13. .

    tnx for info….

    arturo

    21 Nov 14 at 5:29 pm

  14. .

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

    george

    24 Nov 14 at 9:40 am

  15. .

    tnx for info!…

    Kyle

    24 Nov 14 at 6:16 pm

  16. .

    thank you!…

    glen

    25 Nov 14 at 2:14 am

  17. .

    thanks for information!!…

    kyle

    25 Nov 14 at 3:21 am

  18. .

    ñïñ!!…

    lee

    26 Nov 14 at 11:17 am

  19. .

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

    Lance

    28 Nov 14 at 10:25 am

  20. .

    tnx for info!!…

    barry

    28 Nov 14 at 1:56 pm

  21. .

    tnx!…

    Joe

    29 Nov 14 at 2:45 pm

  22. .

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

    Alberto

    10 Dec 14 at 5:03 pm

  23. .

    áëàãîäàðåí….

    ronald

    13 Dec 14 at 12:15 am

  24. .

    tnx for info!!…

    mario

    14 Dec 14 at 8:32 am

  25. .

    tnx for info!!…

    vincent

    14 Dec 14 at 9:11 am

Leave a Reply