Posts Tagged ‘oil sands’

Unlocking the cash cow contradictions

Not sure how one squares this,
Killing Canada’s cash cow not the answer (here)
A report funded by TD Bank on the regional economic impact of climate change should be viewed with a jaundiced eye…it tells us that only by punishing Alberta with massive carbon taxes can the federal government meet its climate-change goal of reducing [...]

Wal-Mart and Climate Change Expectations

Ok, so I am back …. not sure why I left….
Below is a unedited version of a Letter to the Globe I submitted (see Here).
Standing in Wal-Mart, looking around at the Halloween mayhem, I realized just how bad it is. No, it is not consumer confidence, because the lineups were 15 deep, with [...]

Secret Advice to Politicians: Design Better Regulations

This article comes as no surprise to anyone looking at the CCS issue:
Secret advice to politicians: oilsands emissions hard to scrub
…Little of the oilsands’ carbon dioxide can be captured because most emissions aren’t concentrated enough, the notes say. For efficient capture, there must be a high concentration of CO2 coming out of a smoke stack. [...]

Why Subsidies Matter

My attention turned to perverse subsides recently for a number of reasons (see here).
Subsidies are obviously a bad thing, especially if they promote more of something we are spending cash to reduce. In Canada when one thinks of fossil fuel subsidies, one thinks oil and gas. Pembina has done a lot of work [...]

Transportation Fuel Standards – Something to worry about or not

The third largest user of transportation fuels is California, behind the rest of the US and China. And apparently noises of a Low Carbon Fuel Standard in California, similar to the US defense fuel standard banning oil sands oil in federal vehicles, have the Alberta oilmen scared. See here:
the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, [...]

Army Boots III: Regulations are Costly but Contradictions are Free

Ok, so the Conservative Plan is good for oil sands and the Liberal plan is not. This must be the case because the National Post says so:
..his (Dion) “Green Shift” carbon-tax scheme is, by itself, enough to persuade us that he is the wrong man to be running this country. As our [...]

Uncle Sam says keep your carbon…more on the risks of inaction

With all the talk of energy security, I would expect that many in the oil patch discounted talk of limited energy imports to the US based on carbon content. After all, is not Canada a good friend with stable long-term energy supply prospects? Seems though this is not the case (see here), with [...]