EnviroEconomics.ca

…environmental economics and the implications of environmental policy

Putting the Army Boots to Federal Climate Policy

with 21 comments

A neat little piece of climate policy work was just released, albeit quietly, during the federal election. Nic Rivers and Mark Jaccard have been taking analytical jabs at various climate policies for a very long time. Their central theme has been to compare, from an analytical perspective, what government’s say they will achieve and what their policies will most likely deliver. Their latest contribution, with Jotham Peters, can be found here and provides this nice conclusion:

We conclude that, as currently designed, it is highly unlikely that the policies of the government of Canada will achieve the target of reducing national emissions 20% below 2006 levels by 2020. The lack of an economy-wide emissions price and the allowance for 100% offsets for industrial emitters make it highly likely that emissions will be significantly higher than target levels in 2020 and indeed might even be close to today’s levels. Since the government claims that it is intent on achieving its 2020 emissions reduction target, it is difficult to understand why it does not immediately convert the intensity cap to an absolute cap and eliminate or severely reduce the offset provision. It also needs to extend its cap to cover all emissions in the economy.

The bottom line is that politicians have been promising to save the world for a very very long time but have instead been burning our cash while getting very little done (see Nic and Marks other paper here: Burning Our Money to Warm the Planet).

All climate policy by addressing energy use and production can have wide-ranging and long-term effects in the economy, touching virtually everyone as costs get passed through prices. This is why the election climate policy “debate” , and I use this term loosely, deserves more serious attention. But then again in politics, and especially in this campaign, thoughtfulness is in short supply — “Says who… and your Mom wears Army Boots”. Too bad, cause their political gain is our economic and environmental loss.

Written by Dave Sawyer

October 2nd, 2008 at 2:42 pm

21 Responses to 'Putting the Army Boots to Federal Climate Policy'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Putting the Army Boots to Federal Climate Policy'.

  1. .

    ñïñ!…

    Matthew

    31 Jul 14 at 11:41 am

  2. .

    tnx for info….

    Kyle

    23 Aug 14 at 1:16 pm

  3. .

    ??? ?? ????!…

    Dwight

    23 Aug 14 at 2:16 pm

  4. .

    tnx for info….

    Louis

    23 Aug 14 at 5:39 pm

  5. .

    ??????????….

    Kevin

    24 Aug 14 at 7:13 am

  6. .

    thank you!!…

    Jay

    24 Aug 14 at 9:28 am

  7. .

    áëàãîäàðþ….

    terrence

    26 Nov 14 at 5:30 pm

  8. .

    hello….

    shane

    28 Nov 14 at 6:18 am

  9. .

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

    chad

    29 Nov 14 at 4:24 am

  10. .

    thanks!!…

    julian

    29 Nov 14 at 11:35 am

  11. .

    tnx for info….

    floyd

    30 Nov 14 at 12:03 am

  12. .

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

    wade

    1 Dec 14 at 4:49 pm

  13. .

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

    edward

    4 Dec 14 at 12:50 pm

  14. .

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

    benjamin

    10 Dec 14 at 2:55 am

  15. .

    hello….

    trevor

    10 Dec 14 at 10:03 pm

  16. .

    thanks!!…

    Joey

    11 Dec 14 at 7:04 am

  17. .

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

    Harry

    12 Dec 14 at 2:05 am

  18. .

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

    clarence

    12 Dec 14 at 2:31 pm

  19. .

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

    Darrell

    12 Dec 14 at 3:05 pm

  20. .

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

    tracy

    14 Dec 14 at 4:07 am

  21. .

    tnx for info!!…

    joseph

    14 Dec 14 at 8:44 pm

Leave a Reply